For content creators, it’s the video quality and smooth playback that enter the hearts of millions of audiences. These are the features of a video that build credibility for video creators. Before streaming and distributing, a video has to undergo encoding.

Encoding is done through mainly two processes: encoding and interlacing. Each eventually results in a different motion. Content creators must understand the difference between progressive and interlaced video. It will help them avoid issues when matching across various delivery platforms.

Let's understand more about progressive and interlaced video. You will also be able to choose the appropriate method that fits your production workflow. 

What Is Interlaced Video Encoding?

In this type of encoding, each frame is split into two fields. The image is generated through alternating lines. One field contains the odd-numbered horizontal lines, and the next carries the even-numbered lines.

Fields are shown quickly, so on old CRT displays, the eye blends them, and motion appears smoother without doubling bandwidth. Interlacing began as a clever analogue TV solution to cut bandwidth while keeping perceived motion fluid and reducing flicker.

Common interlaced formats use an “i” in their label, for example 480i or 1080i found in traditional broadcast chains. Interlaced is still used in live sports broadcasting workflows and in many legacy video archives and older transmission systems. Because fields capture slightly different instants, fast moves or quick pans can create combing or line-tearing artefacts during playback.

If played on modern progressive displays without careful conversion, interlaced footage often looks soft, jagged, or shows motion artefacts.

What Is Progressive Video Encoding

Progressive encoding renders each frame fully, displaying every scan line in order so each frame is a complete image. Every single frame is self-contained, which makes motion, edges, and fine texture appear sharper and more defined. 

Formats marked with a “p,” such as 720p, 1080p, and 4Kp, follow progressive scanning and have become standard for digital video. Progressive scanning matches how LCD, OLED, LED, and computer monitors display images, avoiding field-based illusions.

Because frames are whole, software and hardware encoders, decoders, and effects engines handle progressive more predictably.

Progressive video decreases the risk of combing artefacts. It simplifies editing, visual effects, colour grading, and frame-accurate cuts.

Streaming platforms, gaming captures, and social video all favour progressive for a consistent viewer experience across devices.

Progressive is also friendlier to modern compression techniques, adaptive streaming, and machine-based video analysis.

Key Differences at a Glance

Pros and Cons Compared

Where Each Type Is Used Today

Interlaced signals remain in many traditional television broadcast chains and in archived footage stored on older media. Live sports distribution and some regional broadcast feeds still use interlacing where infrastructure has not been fully modernised.

Often, older CCTV setups and security camera systems output interlaced video. It happens due to design or through legacy encoders.

Progressive formats dominate streaming services, video-on-demand, social uploads, and most modern content creation pipelines. Gaming capture, screen recording, and mobile device video are almost exclusively progressive for visual fidelity and timing.

New camera sensors, capture cards, and encoder hardware favour progressive masters for higher-quality, future-proof deliverables. Broadcasters moving to file-based and IP-based distribution generally transcode interlaced sources to progressive before final delivery.

When older interlaced material is preserved, restoration teams often create progressive masters to simplify repurposing.

The Global Shift Toward Progressive Encoding

Today, high-definition and ultra-high-definition displays have become standard in homes and offices throughout the globe. Speedy internet connections and advanced compression techniques make full-frame streaming feasible for a wider audience.

H.264, HEVC, and AV1 are adjusted for progressive frames to deliver better quality at any bitrates with full frames. Progressive encoding makes it easy to adapt streaming strategies. It also reduces visible mismatches while switching bitrates mid-playback.

Content creators and studios prefer progressive masters. It helps them avoid repeated format conversions, preventing image quality degradation over time.

Today, broadcasters are upgrading transmission systems, so audiences can get higher fidelity, which is their basic expectation. That’s the reason why progressive encoding is adopted by many and excels across industries.

However, that doesn’t mean the industry isn’t using interlaced encoding. It is still relevant mainly where there’s a tight bandwidth limit, legacy delivery systems and constraints for archival.

Choosing Between Progressive and Interlaced

Broadcasters tied to older transmission chains may still use interlaced formats to match downstream expectations. In low-bandwidth or field-delivery cases where carriers expect interlaced signals, interlaced can remain practical.

Digital creators, OTT platforms, and social publishers should opt for progressive to ensure clarity and cross-device compatibility. Editors and colourists should insist on progressive masters whenever possible. It helps preserve detail and simplify workflows.

When working with interlaced sources, use high-quality deinterlacing tools and test settings to retain motion clarity and detail. Check frame rates and perform careful conversions: poor deinterlacing can introduce blur, ghosting, or timing errors.

If you need to deliver interlaced files, capture and archive a progressive master first, then generate interlaced delivery copies from that master.

Practical Tips for Production and Post

• Capture at the highest practical progressive resolution and frame rate your equipment allows for archiving and future repurposing. 
• When ingesting tapes or feeds that are interlaced, choose deliberate deinterlacing methods that preserve temporal detail.
• Match frame rates and field timings carefully during conversion to avoid motion artefacts or audio sync drift. Use adaptive bitrate streaming with progressive sources to provide the best viewer experience across variable network conditions.
• Communicate final delivery requirements early with distributors and broadcasters to avoid last-minute format clashes.
• Keep a progressive master file as the editorial and archival copy to simplify remasters and downstream re-encodes.
• Test edits, VFX renders, and colour grades on the final intended display type to confirm how motion and detail appear in context. 
• When exporting, choose codecs and bitrates that balance detail with delivery constraints while avoiding repeated lossy conversions.

Conclusion

Progressive encoding is the clear choice for crisp visuals, streamlined editing workflows, and reliable playback across modern devices. Interlaced encoding stays useful mainly for legacy broadcasts, archival formats, or constrained delivery chains that require field-based signals.

Capture and archive a progressive master whenever possible, and deinterlace older sources with care if conversion is necessary. Plan delivery codecs and bitrates around viewer devices and distribution channels to protect motion clarity and fine detail.

Ready to future-proof your video workflow and scale streaming with confidence? Explore Enveu to manage, monetise, and distribute your progressive content seamlessly. Choose progressive to protect image quality and ensure your work looks its best on every screen.

FAQ